|
|
|
|
| If Ignorance Is Bliss.....
Then Surely It Must Be Folly To Be Wise!"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" I'm starting to blog again. However I will ruffle some feathers so if it pisses you off so be it, and if you have something constructive to add do so. If you just want to be bitchy then be forewarned. It's just a button push away from blogville to banville.
Now if you're wondering why so many posts on January 12, 2007, read just pissed off at Aff
Come See
Blog World
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a gun REALLY! Lets just call it a Party Favor.
|
Posted:Nov 8, 2008 10:27 am
Last Updated:Nov 9, 2008 4:43 am
2447 Views
|
In all fairness, we can't really call Obama's proposed national service plan a new draft. First, he's not talking about requiring young people to do military service YET. Second, we are getting decidedly mixed signals as to whether the service will be compulsory. At first, the word "required" was used freely; now you see much talk of tax credits, less talk of requirement.
Nevertheless, this new program certainly feels like the next step toward a new draft. Just as Ike's planners made sure that the national highway system could see usage as a military transport system, Obama's civilian service corps could make mustering a draft army much, much easier.
After all, this is the guy who said (vis-a-vis the establishment of ROTC programs on all college campuses):
I think it's important for the president to say, this is an important obligation. If we are going into war, then all of us go, not just some.
Hmmm. And when did you sign up, Barky? OH YEAH thats right you couldn't sign up as your birth certificate is still MIA.
You probably already know this quote, from a speech he gave in Colorado Springs:
"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
God only knows where the money is to come from.Not from the American people, Surely not
Obama now seems to have drawn this big idea from his not so secret buddy Rahm Emanuel, that noted rust-proofer of brakes in the IDF, who wrote the following in a 2006 book ominously called The Plan:
It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service.
Here's how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They'll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we're hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities' most pressing needs.
Wittily, Emanuel adds: "This is not a draft",lets just call it a bum fuck without the prerequisite reach around. This puckish reference goes, of course, to Magritte: "Ceci n'est pas une pipe."
I always get a little worried - more than a little, truth be told - when politicians insist that our post-Apocalypse clean-up crew is insufficiently staffed. That sort of talk makes me wonder what they're up to. Especially when we think back to the ominous words of one Joseph Biden:
"It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking... Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy." One has to wonder what the hell Joe the Zionist Biden knows that he ain't really telling you.
|
|
|
2
Comments
|
|
Democrats at the polls
|
Posted:Nov 7, 2008 9:45 pm
Last Updated:Nov 7, 2008 9:52 pm
2048 Views
|
The Democratic candidate's stated polices on the conflict dovetail exactly with those of Rove, Bush and McCain: Thousands of more troops. More military hardware. More drone missile strikes, not only in Afghanistan but in Pakistan as well. Obama has also pledged to pressure the Europeans to send more troops and hardware of their own to Afghanistan, with "fewer restrictions" on their combat operations.
In other words, he will answer it with steel, fire and blood.
What is the degree of complicity of the American people in these policies of unprovoked military invasion, mass murder of innocent people, and mass destruction?
Here are some relevant facts.
The percentage of eligible voters who voted was close to 62.5%.
The total number of votes was close to 120 million. Of these, about 52% went to Obama, 46% to McCain, 1% to Nader, 1% to Barr.
The percentage of American voters who voted against the policies approved by Rove, Bush, McCain and Obama was negligibly small.
Does it then make sense to distinguish between the actions and policies of the US Government and those that are supported by the American people (considered collectively, as a nation)?
Of the 192 million Americans who had the opportunity to reject the murderous policies outlined above, there were less than 2.4 million who did so.
If people are going to bray and ee-yore like proud Donkeys regarding the "increased voter participation" turning out for this "historic election of America's first (never mind the pseudo- prefix, please) Black " then they're going to have to admit and acknowledge that only 2.4 million of those that turned out actually voted for something that resembles change.
America should collectively hang its head in shame, esp. the democraps .
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
All Hail Israels New Chief ASS KISSER Elect
|
Posted:Nov 5, 2008 6:40 pm
Last Updated:Nov 6, 2008 7:02 am
3761 Views
|
Here is full text of Obama's speech, as prepared for delivery:
Remarks at AIPAC Policy Conference
Senator Barack Obama
June 4, 2008
As Prepared for Delivery
It's great to see so many friends from across the country. I want to congratulate Howard Friedman, David Victor and Howard Kohr on a successful conference, and on the completion of a new headquarters just a few blocks away.
Before I begin, I want to say that I know some provocative emails have been circulating throughout Jewish communities across the country. A few of you may have gotten them. They're filled with tall tales and dire warnings about a certain candidate for President. And all I want to say is - let me know if you see this guy named Barack Obama, because he sounds pretty frightening.
But if anyone has been confused by these emails, I want you to know that today I'll be speaking from my heart, and as a true friend of Israel. And I know that when I visit with AIPAC, I am among friends. Good friends. Friends who share my strong commitment to make sure that the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable today, tomorrow, and forever.
One of the many things that I admire about AIPAC is that you fight for this common cause from the bottom up. The lifeblood of AIPAC is here in this room- grassroots activists of all ages, from all parts of the country, who come to Washington year after year to make your voices heard. Nothing reflects the face of AIPAC more than the 1,200 students who have travelled here to make it clear to the world that the bond between Israel and the United States is rooted in more than our shared national interests -- it's rooted in the shared values and shared stories of our people. And as President, I will work with you to ensure that it this bond strengthened.
I first became familiar with the story of Israel when I was eleven years old. I learned of the long journey and steady determination of the Jewish people to preserve their identity through faith, family and culture. Year after year, century after century, Jews carried on their traditions, and their dream of a homeland, in the face of impossible odds.
The story made a powerful impression on me. I had grown up without a sense of roots. My father was black, he was from Kenya, and he left us when I was two. My mother was white, she was from Kansas, and I'd moved with her to Indonesia and then back to Hawaii. In many ways, I didn't know where I came from. So I was drawn to the belief that you could sustain a spiritual, emotional and cultural identity. And I deeply understood the Zionist idea - that there is always a homeland at the center of our story.
I also learned about the horror of the Holocaust, and the terrible urgency it brought to the journey home to Israel. For much of my childhood, I lived with my grandparents. My grandfather had served in World War II, and so had my great uncle. He was a Kansas boy, who probably never expected to see Europe - let alone the horrors that awaited him there. And for months after he came home from Germany, he remained in a state of shock, alone with the painful memories that wouldn't leave his head.
You see, my great uncle had been a part of the 89th Infantry Division - the first Americans to reach a Nazi concentration camp. They liberated Ohrdruf, part of Buchenwald, on an April day in 1945. The horrors of that camp go beyond our capacity to imagine. Tens of thousands died of hunger, torture, disease, or plain murder - part of the Nazi killing machine that killed 6 million people.
When the Americans marched in, they discovered huge piles of dead bodies and starving survivors. General Eisenhower ordered Germans from the nearby town to tour the camp, so they could see what was being done in their name. He ordered American troops to tour the camp, so they could see the evil they were fighting against. He invited Congressmen and journalists to bear witness. And he ordered that photographs and films be made. Explaining his actions, Eisenhower said that he wanted to produce, "first-hand evidence of these things, if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to propaganda."
I saw some of those very images at Yad Vashem, and they never leave you. And those images just hint at the stories that survivors of the Shoah carried with them. Like Eisenhower, each of us bears witness to anyone and everyone who would deny these unspeakable crimes, or ever speak of repeating them. We must mean what we say when we speak the words: "never again."
It was just a few years after the liberation of the camps that David Ben-Gurion declared the founding of the Jewish State of Israel. We know that the establishment of Israel was just and necessary, rooted in centuries of struggle, and decades of patient work. But 60 years later, we know that we cannot relent, we cannot yield, and as President I will never compromise when it comes to Israel's security.
Not when there are still voices that deny the Holocaust. Not when there are terrorist groups and political leaders committed to Israel's destruction. Not when there are maps across the Middle East that don't even acknowledge Israel's existence, and government-funded textbooks filled with hatred toward Jews. Not when there are rockets raining down on Sderot, and Israeli have to take a deep breath and summon uncommon courage every time they board a bus or walk to school.
I have long understood Israel's quest for peace and need for security. But never more so than during my travels there two years ago. Flying in an IDF helicopter, I saw a narrow and beautiful strip of land nestled against the Mediterranean. On the ground, I met a family who saw their house destroyed by a Katyusha Rocket. I spoke to Israeli troops who faced daily threats as they maintained security near the blue line. I talked to people who wanted nothing more simple, or elusive, than a secure future for their .
I have been proud to be a part of a strong, bi-partisan consensus that has stood by Israel in the face of all threats. That is a commitment that both John McCain and I share, because support for Israel in this country goes beyond party. But part of our commitment must be speaking up when Israel's security is at risk, and I don't think any of us can be satisfied that America's recent foreign policy has made Israel more secure.
Hamas now controls Gaza. Hizbollah has tightened its grip on southern Lebanon, and is flexing its muscles in Beirut. Because of the war in Iraq, Iran -which always posed a greater threat to Israel than Iraq - is emboldened, and poses the greatest strategic challenge to the United States and Israel in the Middle East in a generation. Iraq is unstable, and al Qaeda has stepped up its recruitment. Israel's quest for peace with its neighbors has stalled, despite the heavy burdens borne by the Israeli people. And America is more isolated in the region, reducing our strength and jeopardizing Israel's safety.
The question is how to move forward. There are those who would continue and intensify this failed status quo, ignoring eight years of accumulated evidence that our foreign policy is dangerously flawed. And then there are those who would lay all of the problems of the Middle East at the doorstep of Israel and its supporters, as if the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the root of all trouble in the region. These voices blame the Middle East's only democracy for the region's extremism. They offer the false promise that abandoning a stalwart ally is somehow the path to strength. It is not, it never has been, and it never will be.
Our alliance is based on shared interests and shared values. Those who threaten Israel threaten us. Israel has always faced these threats on the front lines. And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel's security.
That starts with ensuring Israel's qualitative military advantage. I will ensure that Israel can defend itself from any threat - from Gaza to Tehran. Defense cooperation between the United States and Israel is a model of success, and must be deepened. As President, I will implement a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion in assistance to Israel over the next decade - investments to Israel's security that will not be tied to any other nation. First, we must approve the foreign aid request for 2009. Going forward, we can enhance our cooperation on missile defense. We should export military equipment to our ally Israel under the same guidelines as NATO. And I will always stand up for Israel's right to defend itself in the United Nations and around the world.
Across the political spectrum, Israelis understand that real security can only come through lasting peace. And that is why we - as friends of Israel - must resolve to do all we can to help Israel and its neighbors to achieve it. Because a secure, lasting peace is in Israel's national interest. It is in America's national interest. And it is in the interest of the Palestinian people and the Arab world. As President, I will work to help Israel achieve the goal of two states, a Jewish state of Israel and a Palestinian state, living side by side in peace and security. And I won't wait until the waning days of my presidency. I will take an active role, and make a personal commitment to do all I can to advance the cause of peace from the start of my Administration.
The long road to peace requires Palestinian partners committed to making the journey. We must isolate Hamas unless and until they renounce terrorism, recognize Israel's right to exist, and abide by past agreements. There is no room at the negotiating table for terrorist organizations. That is why I opposed holding elections in 2006 with Hamas on the ballot. The Israelis and the Palestinian Authority warned us at the time against holding these elections. But this Administration pressed ahead, and the result is a Gaza controlled by Hamas, with rockets raining down on Israel.
The Palestinian people must understand that progress will not come through the false prophets of extremism or the corrupt use of foreign aid. The United States and the international community must stand by Palestinians who are committed to cracking down on terror and carrying the burden of peacemaking. I will strongly urge Arab governments to take steps to normalize relations with Israel, and to fulfill their responsibility to pressure extremists and provide real support for President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad. Egypt must cut off the smuggling of weapons into Gaza. Israel can also advance the cause of peace by taking appropriate steps - consistent with its security - to ease the freedom of movement for Palestinians, improve economic conditions in the West Bank, and to refrain from building new settlements - as it agreed to with the Bush Administration at Annapolis.
Let me be clear. Israel's security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable. The Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and cohesive, and that allows them to prosper - but any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel's identity as a Jewish state, with secure, recognized and defensible borders. Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.
I have no illusions that this will be easy. It will require difficult decisions on both sides. But Israel is strong enough to achieve peace, if it has partners who are committed to the goal. Most Israelis and Palestinians want peace, and we must strengthen their hand. The United States must be a strong and consistent partner in this process - not to force concessions, but to help committed partners avoid stalemate and the kind of vacuums that are filled by violence. That's what I commit to do as President of the United States.
The threats to Israel start close to home, but they don't end there. Syria continues its support for terror and meddling in Lebanon. And Syria has taken dangerous steps in pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, which is why Israeli action was justified to end that threat.
I also believe that the United States has a responsibility to support Israel's efforts to renew peace talks with the Syrians. We must never force Israel to the negotiating table, but neither should we ever block negotiations when Israel's leaders decide that they may serve Israeli interests. As President, I will do whatever I can to help Israel succeed in these negotiations. And success will require the full enforcement of Security Council Resolution 1701 in Lebanon, and a stop to Syria's support for terror. It is time for this reckless behavior to come to an end.
There is no greater threat to Israel - or to the peace and stability of the region - than Iran. Now this audience is made up of both Republicans and Democrats, and the enemies of Israel should have no doubt that, regardless of party, Americans stand shoulder-to-shoulder in our commitment to Israel's security. So while I don't want to strike too partisan a note here today, I do want to address some willful mischaracterizations of my positions.
The Iranian regime supports violent extremists and challenges us across the region. It pursues a nuclear capability that could spark a dangerous arms race, and raise the prospect of a transfer of nuclear know-how to terrorists. Its President denies the Holocaust and threatens to wipe Israel off the map. The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.
But just as we are clear-eyed about the threat, we must be clear about the failure of today's policy. We knew, in 2002, that Iran supported terrorism. We knew Iran had an illicit nuclear program. We knew Iran posed a grave threat to Israel. But instead of pursuing a strategy to address this threat, we ignored it and instead invaded and occupied Iraq. When I opposed the war, I warned that it would fan the flames of extremism in the Middle East. That is precisely what happened in Iran - the hardliners tightened their grip, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected President in 2005. And the United States and Israel are less secure.
I respect Senator McCain, and look forward to a substantive debate with him these next five months. But on this point, we have differed, and we will differ. Senator McCain refuses to understand or acknowledge the failure of the policy that he would continue. He criticizes my willingness to use strong diplomacy, but offers only an alternate reality - one where the war in Iraq has somehow put Iran on its heels. The truth is the opposite. Iran has strengthened its position. Iran is now enriching uranium, and has reportedly stockpiled 150 kilos of low enriched uranium. Its support for terrorism and threats toward Israel have increased. Those are the facts, they cannot be denied, and I refuse to continue a policy that has made the United States and Israel less secure.
Senator McCain offers a false choice: stay the course in Iraq, or cede the region to Iran. I reject this logic because there is a better way. Keeping all of our troops tied down indefinitely in Iraq is not the way to weaken Iran - it is precisely what has strengthened it. It is a policy for staying, not a plan for victory. I have proposed a responsible, phased redeployment of our troops from Iraq. We will get out as carefully as we were careless getting in. We will finally pressure Iraq's leaders to take meaningful responsibility for their own future.
We will also use all elements of American power to pressure Iran. I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. That starts with aggressive, principled diplomacy without self-defeating preconditions, but with a clear-eyed understanding of our interests. We have no time to waste. We cannot unconditionally rule out an approach that could prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. We have tried limited, piecemeal talks while we outsource the sustained work to our European allies. It is time for the United States to lead.
There will be careful preparation. We will open up lines of communication, build an agenda, coordinate closely with our allies, and evaluate the potential for progress. Contrary to the claims of some, I have no interest in sitting down with our adversaries just for the sake of talking. But as President of the United States, I would be willing to lead tough and principled diplomacy with the appropriate Iranian leader at a time and place of my choosing ‒ if, and only if - it can advance the interests of the United States.
Only recently have some come to think that diplomacy by definition cannot be tough. They forget the example of Truman, and Kennedy and Reagan. These Presidents understood that diplomacy backed by real leverage was a fundamental tool of statecraft. And it is time to once again make American diplomacy a tool to succeed, not just a means of containing failure. We will pursue this diplomacy with no illusions about the Iranian regime. Instead, we will present a clear choice. If you abandon your dangerous nuclear program, support for terror, and threats to Israel, there will be meaningful incentives - including the lifting of sanctions, and political and economic integration with the international community. If you refuse, we will ratchet up the pressure.
My presidency will strengthen our hand as we restore our standing. Our willingness to pursue diplomacy will make it easier to mobilize others to join our cause. If Iran fails to change course when presented with this choice by the United States, it will be clear - to the people of Iran, and to the world - that the Iranian regime is the author of its own isolation. That will strengthen our hand with Russia and China as we insist on stronger sanctions in the Security Council. And we should work with Europe, Japan and the Gulf states to find every avenue outside the UN to isolate the Iranian regime - from cutting off loan guarantees and expanding financial sanctions, to banning the export of refined petroleum to Iran, to boycotting firms associated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, whose Quds force has rightly been labeled a terrorist organization.
I was interested to see Senator McCain propose divestment as a source of leverage -not the bigoted divestment that has sought to punish Israeli scientists and academics, but divestment targeted at the Iranian regime. It's a good concept, but not a new one. I introduced legislation over a year ago that would encourage states and the private sector to divest from companies that do business in Iran. This bill has bipartisan support, but for reasons that I'll let him explain, Senator McCain never signed on. Meanwhile, an anonymous Senator is blocking the bill. It is time to pass this into law so that we can tighten the squeeze on the Iranian regime. We should also pursue other unilateral sanctions that target Iranian banks and assets.
And we must free ourselves from the tyranny of oil. The price of a barrel of oil is one of the most dangerous weapons in the world. Petrodollars pay for weapons that kill American troops and Israeli citizens. And the Bush Administration's policies have driven up the price of oil, while its energy policy has made us more dependent on foreign oil and gas. It's time for the United States to take real steps to end our addiction to oil. And we can join with Israel, building on last year's US-Israel Energy Cooperation Act, to deepen our partnership in developing alternative sources of energy by increasing scientific collaboration and joint research and development. The surest way to increase our leverage in the long term is to stop bankrolling the Iranian regime.
Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel. Sometimes there are no alternatives to confrontation. But that only makes diplomacy more important. If we must use military force, we are more likely to succeed, and will have far greater support at home and abroad, if we have exhausted our diplomatic efforts.
That is the change we need in our foreign policy. Change that restores American power and influence. Change accompanied by a pledge that I will make known to allies and adversaries alike: that America maintains an unwavering friendship with Israel, and an unshakeable commitment to its security.
As members of AIPAC, you have helped advance this bipartisan consensus to support and defend our ally Israel. And I am sure that today on Capitol Hill you will be meeting with members of Congress and spreading the word. But we are here because of more than policy. We are here because the values we hold dear are deeply embedded in the story of Israel.
Just look at what Israel has accomplished in 60 years. From decades of struggle and the terrible wake of the Holocaust, a nation was forged to provide a home for Jews from all corners of the world - from Syria to Ethiopia to the Soviet Union. In the face of constant threats, Israel has triumphed. In the face of constant peril, Israel has prospered. In a state of constant insecurity, Israel has maintained a vibrant and open discourse, and a resilient commitment to the rule of law.
As any Israeli will tell you, Israel is not a perfect place, but like the United States it sets an example for all when it seeks a more perfect future. These same qualities can be found among American Jews. It is why so many Jewish Americans have stood by Israel, while advancing the American story. Because there is a commitment embedded in the Jewish faith and tradition: to freedom and fairness; to social justice and equal opportunity. To tikkun olam - the obligation to repair this world.
I will never forget that I would not be standing here today if it weren't for that commitment. In the great social movements in our country's history, Jewish and African Americans have stood shoulder to shoulder. They took buses down south together. They marched together. They bled together. And Jewish Americans like Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner were willing to die alongside a black man - James Chaney -on behalf of freedom and equality.
Their legacy is our inheritance. We must not allow the relationship between Jews and African Americans to suffer. This is a bond that must be strengthened. Together, we can rededicate ourselves to end prejudice and combat hatred in all of its forms. Together, we can renew our commitment to justice. Together, we can join our voices together, and in doing so make even the mightiest of walls fall down.
That work must include our shared commitment to Israel. You and I know that we must do more than stand still. Now is the time to be vigilant in facing down every foe, just as we move forward in seeking a future of peace for the of Israel, and for all . Now is the time to stand by Israel as it writes the next chapter in its extraordinary journey. Now is the time to join together in the work of repairing this world.
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
I feel like a New Man already so bend over America
|
Posted:Nov 5, 2008 7:23 am
Last Updated:Nov 5, 2008 7:40 am
1972 Views
|
Change is good. Hey Joe were does Vaseline come from? like I know where it goes, but where da hell does it come from? an Americas gonna need a whole shit load of it while I'm doing that which I do best so Yuh better order LOTS.
And by the way Joe get that shit distruber Joe da Plumber on da line cause der gonna be a whole lot o shit going down an we want it flowing all da way to Americas front porch, cause like dae gotta eat something.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
|
Bye Bye Sara
|
Posted:Nov 5, 2008 6:11 am
Last Updated:Nov 6, 2008 10:40 am
2869 Views
|
To bad yuh didn't get to the trough of pork barrel spending, I'm sure the slop on your lips wouldn't have looked out of place.
|
|
|
3
Comments
|
|
Who Is Barack Obama? REALLY
|
Posted:Nov 3, 2008 12:38 pm
Last Updated:Nov 5, 2008 5:18 am
4029 Views
|
This man came from nowhere backed by the same sponsors that shaped the star-crossed career of the war criminal, Henry Kissinger. Obama is someone that cannot be subjected to direct debates wherein the contestants face each other and ask direct questions of each other'the new political machine saw to that'and Obama did not deviate from their instructions.
Today Barack's case goes again to the Supreme Court, where again they will dodge the issue and deny that they have any standing to rule; which is the exact opposite of what they did for Bush Jr. in 2000. Some believe that this will be turned over to the Electoral College for a final decision; but the 'College' has no standing in this matter as they are a purely political body in service to the same hidden hands that molded Barack from the clay of obscurity.
Congress is the one body that has 'standing' in this matter but they too have already given away their powers to the same faceless creatures that brought us GWB and this on-going avalanche of failure, of wars unending, and of human slaughter the world over. The Congress has no spine and lacks the stomach to do what must be done, which is to simply demand written proof, according to Article Two of the US Constitution ' that Barack Obama is a natural-born American.
What is Barack Obama? To me he is the twenty-first century version of Elmer Gantry, a common snake-oil salesman that appears with the morning sun only to disappear back into the shadows of the coming night. He stands for nothing because he has no experience, and he has never fought for anything beyond himself or his continued political intrigues. He is someone that has changed his name and possibly his country more than once, and now he chooses to attempt to keep these matters strictly private.
Whatever he is Barack Obama does not posses leadership capabilities, he is too slick by half, and too afraid of other people to ever be a leader. And all of this comes down to why he finds himself in this situation at this present moment. He must answer to the public for his actions in failing to make clear his legal qualifications to be the president of the United States of America. If he were half the American he claims to be, he would be proud to claim his citizenship' indeed he might seek to shout it to the world. But that's not the boy that inhabits Obama's skin; that knows there is a problem and so far he has chosen not to face it!
In the Oklahoma I grew up in Barack would have been challenged upon arrival, and since he prefers stealth to direct answers, he would probably have been dragged into the town square and been - whipped; before being sent upon his way.
The public Obama has been selected by hidden hands to fulfill massively deceptive agendas that are not in the best interests of this nation. He is not what the millions that believe in him think he is, at all. Here are some of the other little hidden things that no real president ought to withhold from those that he claims he wants to serve:
|
|
|
13
Comments
|
|
As Red Fox said this Is The Big One.
|
Posted:Nov 2, 2008 3:54 pm
Last Updated:May 17, 2024 7:15 am
1909 Views
|
Presidential politics in America have become a big joke. Not only to Americans but the world watching YOU thinks so also.
And who can blame them? America has become nothing more than a colossal joke, just not a very funny one. The corporate media decides early on who can even be considered as a candidate. Remember Fred Thompson, the media praised the actor as being a great choice for the Republican nomination then they decided that a Fool like McCain would be a better choice , and poof poor Fred was gone. At the same time the media completely ignored or poked fun at Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) who actually predicted current events perfectly. You were told he was some sort of fringe candidate.
The presidential debates have been too few and merely staged propaganda theater with no real discussions taking place between the candidates. Not that it matters much because again the all invasive national media has been telling anyone who will listen that Barack Obama is The One and John McCain is a stuttering fool. Well John McCain is indeed a stuttering fool and a coward to boot, and Obama is NOTHING more than a hired stage monkey. Again no inflection on Bonzo, at least the chimp probably was born in America.
Even without the electronic voting fraud machines in more than half of the country there is really no free election taking place. Not with the media, actually the media's owners picking who gets coverage starting with the early primaries all the way through to election day on November 5. It's a rigged game from day one without any real input from the U.S. citizen. Why? Because the US citizen is as stupid as it gets, not just ignorant but REALLY STUPID, and the powers that be know it.
If you've been watching television lately you already know that Barack Obama will be the next president, it was decided long ago and not by you or your neighbor . Really I am not joking I predicted it here long ago, see for yourself. You don't even need to leave the house to vote. You see that is the big joke. The media pundits know it. The elite in Washington know it. The bankers, corp. 100 and military industrial complex know it because it was their decision.
So it goes as the nation is stolen by the banking and corporate elite and your entire system of government has become a fraud and you Americans just keep on laughing. Well laugh it up because the joke is on you Amerika , and we'll all keep watching you just as prey watches a wounded predator.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
OH YEH I'VE GOT THIS NIGGLING FEELING, ITS GONNA BE FUN
|
Posted:Nov 2, 2008 1:39 am
Last Updated:Nov 4, 2008 2:31 pm
3147 Views
|
get ready for the big Change - Chicago Style
Body count In the last six months
- Chicago - 292 killed (murdered)
- Iraq - 221
unemployment rate, well over 7%. 6th worst in the country
Chicago is a combat zone. Who is in charge?
(The leadership in Illinois)
- Senator Barack Obama (Democrat)
- Senator Dick Durbin (Democrat)
- Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. (Democrat)
- Governor Rod Blogojevich (Democrat)
- House leader Mike Madigan (Democrat)
- Attorney Genera Lisa Madigan ( of Mike), (Democrat)
- Mayor Richard M. Daley ( of former Mayor Richard J. Daley)
(Democrat)
Of course they're all blaming each other. Why?
They can't blame Republicans, there aren't any!
State pension fund $44 Billion in debt, worst in country.
Cook County (Chicago) Sales tax 10.25% highest in country. (Look it
up if you want).
Chicago school system one of the worst in country.
This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois. And
he says he is going to 'fix' Washington politics?
|
|
|
4
Comments
|
|
Do Yuh Wana Play Go?
|
Posted:Oct 31, 2008 5:20 pm
Last Updated:May 17, 2024 7:15 am
2031 Views
|
To a certain degree it makes a great deal of sense and it's come into my mind over the recent months glaringly up close fine German lens-like "crystal" as I like to say, either when understanding someone's negative attention or when I had to impress someone with their need to understand me in ways that I , thankfully, don't encounter that much anymore but which residence in the former United States used to make necessary on occasion. Except we're not talking about negative attention here and "crystal" only gets said in reply so never mind.
Some of you may be familiar with the game of "Risk". I had that game around for awhile but it was never easy to find enough people to play it with because it requires getting several really smart and informed people into the same room to do it and that's a commodity that is increasingly rare as time passes. It's a little like Chess but I think you get the idea and you can google it if you don't. It might help to encourage you to look at the way Napoleon liked to wage war. Even though he was one of history's biggest losers he was also one of the great military tacticians of all time. He revolutionized certain facets of combat.
Those of you who have been paying attention and I suggest that that is about as many people as are available to play "Risk", or who understand how "Go" works have probably noticed a most curious thing. To illustrate this, I have to take you back a little. Remember how over the last eight years, the collective media was in a mosh-pit "Going out of business!" frenzy at a major department store/ $200.00 laptop, CLOSEOUT! customer trampling mood to stick their snouts up Bush's ass when there was only one hole, first come first served' kind of a thing? And
How they assisted in selling the 9/11 'bend over and wait' scenario and gave that big time 'reach around' when The Supremes were showing us how it is that you do that thing beforehand down in Florida? And how they packaged all those wars and did all that "no knock" on the economy and shoehorned all those legislators into their Peter Principle follow the leader slots?
Did you notice how, no matter what the offense was no matter how criminal or treasonous the act was that is was okay and "Can I have another Sir!" You saw that right? And have you seen how all the odious sleaze balls who used the blood of dead Iraqi's and Palestinians; Papuans, Afghanis and sundry as printer's ink suddenly did a one eighty and now are hanging mistletoe over Obama's ass? Have you seen how every McCain misstep is screaming in ten foot letters from your TV set? Have you not wondered at the crucifixion of Palin and the strange affair of the hundred and fifty thousand dollar wardrobe and not wondered who was directing all of these photo-ops?
I've been wondering about this see, the way I remember it the people manufacturing the news and delivering it to you were some of the worst, low to the ground shit-weasels that I've ever seen and integrity and anything virtuous if it got anywhere near any of these people there would have been cases of spontaneous combustion going off like it was a Chinese New Year now step by step all of a sudden now you see it now you don't here today washed in the blood tomorrow these whores and their pimps have found themselves a new Teflon angel?
How come after eight years of "Please please screw me in every unnatural way in front of a live audience and then give me a Golden Shower so I can go home to my wife." reporting all of a sudden but step by step we're seeing the new Camelot bondage apparatus machine go on sale everywhere when it wasn't even around in the first place to begin with? Don't try to understand that sentence, you'll just hurt yourself. Oh wait a minute maybe that's the point. Maybe somebody did go down to Compton and find themselves some pipe swinging Calypso singers to get medieval on your ass.
Oh trust me that wasn't a racial slur it was just me at "the spinning wheel, baby." doing the "Hip Ghand" by way of Lord Buckley and the Zionists are going to love it cause as much as "the lady doth protest too much." they are creaming in their blood-stained jeans over this.
You notice how Obama banana dana is starting to look like that South American dance craze that I can't even remember the name of right now but that I even saw happening in baseball stadiums during it's brief illustrious career? Man didn't the video feature a couple of old white guys demonstrating it? You can look for Brzezinski on Dancing with the Stars right around Valentine's Day.
This isn't to say that Obama isn't or wasn't or couldn't have been one of the good guys if he had opted for something else while he was being fast-tracked to one more betrayal of the human race everyone has a little Raskalnikov in them even if it is after the fact. Yeah, people haven't you noticed how Obama has more money behind him than the last cat that wailed in the alley on your miserable, "I can endure this." ass? which followed another "I can't Believe this isn't Hugh Masakela" and no that's not a sax playing cocaine snorting Bush (Daddy Bush) Buddy? Tell me you saw that. Tell me you've been watching. Or at least tell me you want to come to my house for a little informal game of Backgammon for money.
I don't know how many times they are going to play the 'bait and switch' game on you before you wake up. I do believe you like it. That's been my mistake all this time. I thought you were like me a little twisted but strictly Vanilla as the ads in the sex personals go Don't tell me you like it. I can't take losing my and losing you at the same time.
I've said it before and I will say it again. I wouldn't care all that much what these nasty reptiles get up to if it weren't for all the dead body's stinking in our foreign dump sites. Sure it's karma and the people dying are quite possibly the people who were doing it last time but as it goes when you keep on playing "an eye for an eye" you wind up with a lot of blind people gumming each other to death.
I've got a point and that point would be you. Level the playing field or wind up as part of the pavement. It's too late this go around but I hope it won't be too late in 2012. Let what should be a lesson actually be a lesson for once. Realize that if they had wanted it that way that everything being said about McCain and Palin could just as easily have been said about Obama. All it would take is a change in the lighting and the staging. If they had wanted it that way then Obama would look like one more John Kerry and McCain would be Reagan like it had eyes all over again.
It doesn't matter in respect of my life and as I said I wouldn't maybe care that much except that I know they are using real people and destroying real lives and I've got this problem I've got this terrible problem that's like a bad tooth in Calcutta. I can't block out the screams and the grief and the suffering hearts. They are part of my own heart and the truth is that I would not have a heart if I could not feel these things and you are all responsible for turning your head and playing make-believe in a real world. It's one thing when you see it on TV. It's another thing when it happens to you and it will. Mark my words. It will.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
No Matter how you spread it, Shit still Stinks, and this piece of Excrement, Stinks
|
Posted:Oct 30, 2008 7:17 pm
Last Updated:Nov 2, 2008 1:12 pm
1918 Views
|
Which country comes foremost in US foreign policy, the United States or Israel? Sometimes it's hard to tell. The Israeli-centric approach to US Middle East foreign policy, which is unfair to the Palestinians and dangerous to a United States dependent on foreign oil, will not change in an Obama Administration. Which office is Obama running for?
On June 4, 2008, the day after Barack Obama clinched the Democratic nomination, he spoke to AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Here are some excerpts of that speech:
I want you to know that today I'll be speaking from my heart and as a true friend of Israel. And I know that when I visit with AIPAC, I am among friends. Good Friends. Friends who share my strong commitment to make sure that they bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable today, tomorrow, and forever.
... I was drawn to the belief that you could sustain a spiritual, emotional and cultural identity. And I deeply understood the Zionist idea - that there is always a homeland at the center of our story. ... We know the establishment of Israel was just and necessary, rooted in centuries of struggle and decades of patient work. But 60 years later, we know that we cannot relent, we cannot yield, and as president I will never compromise when it comes to Israel's security....Those who threaten Israel threaten us. Israel has always faced these threats on the front lines. And I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel's security. ... Let me be clear. Israel's security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable. The Palestinians need a state that is contiguous and cohesive, and that allows them to prosper - but any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel's identity as a Jewish state, with secure, recognized and defensible borders. Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.1
Great speech...for a candidate for Prime Minister of Israel.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
Lets not forget the White Trailor Trash
|
Posted:Oct 23, 2008 9:00 pm
Last Updated:Jan 19, 2009 1:03 pm
2260 Views
|
THE HIGH COST OF (FASHION) POLITICS
The Republican Party spent $150,000 in two months on clothes, hair styling and accessories for Sarah Palin and her family.
$75,062.63
Two shopping trips to Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, Minn.
$49,425.74
Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York
$9,447.71
Total of three payments to Macy's in Minneapolis
$5,102.71
Payment to Bloomingdale's New York
$4,902.45
Payment to Atelier, a high-class shopping destination for men
$4,716.49
Hair and makeup through September
$789.72
Payment to Barney's New York
$92
Romper and matching hat with ears for baby Trig at Pacifier
Just think how much this will be able to spend when she's Screwing ALL of YOU
|
|
|
5
Comments
|
|
Where oh Where has Michelle Obama Rama.
|
Posted:Oct 23, 2008 3:42 pm
Last Updated:Oct 30, 2008 7:31 pm
1912 Views
|
Or much more importantly, What color should her Pimps new car be?
The Bill for this whores lunch.
2 Lobster Hors D'oeuvers.......$50.00
2 Whole Steamed Lobsters........$100.00
1 Irainian Osetra Caviar........$150.00
1 Bollinger Champange...........$44.00
subtotal........................$344.00
20% service chg.................$68.00
8.38%nyt........................$447.39
Must be treating Whores better these days, Huh.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (rm_swallow22us) use [blog rm_swallow22us] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
71
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Comments by Others
| Ghosts from our recent tragedy spring at us. (4) | LoveHoochies
Nov 17, 2010 5:03 pm |
| There was a time (8) | Cockeyedoptmist2
Aug 10, 2009 6:17 pm |
| just pissed off at Aff (9) | itsall4you20053
Feb 15, 2009 8:54 pm |
| If You Americans weren't so close I'd think it almost Funny. (7) | alissatim
Feb 8, 2009 5:44 am |
| Crime and Punishment (3) | mmmlike2taste
Jan 13, 2009 5:41 pm |
| Who are you anyway? (5) | 4fntsy
Dec 23, 2008 8:11 am |
| THE LORELEI (3) | PixieKittySC
Dec 15, 2008 11:13 am |
| SURPRISE! (4) | mmmlike2taste
Dec 1, 2008 11:08 pm |
| Long live the anti occupation resistance in Afghanistan! (7) | rm_skyeone2
Nov 13, 2008 6:55 am |
| And a heartfelt thanks to Stupidest people on the planet (5) | BuffyBitchSlayer
Nov 12, 2008 4:23 pm |
| This is not a gun REALLY! Lets just call it a Party Favor. (4) | SolarPowered0
Nov 9, 2008 12:15 am |
|
|
